# qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Torrent | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 760 | 93 053 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 | +1 259 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 52 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Dockerfile | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.

qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 259 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qbittorrent-linuxserverio-vs-uptime-kuma