# qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) vs unsloth

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | unsloth |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Torrent | #1 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 1 758 | 78 729 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +2 005 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 52 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

unsloth scores 85/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.

qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for unsloth.

If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; unsloth needs more configuration.

unsloth is growing faster right now (+2 005 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio.md)
- [unsloth](https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qbittorrent-linuxserverio-vs-unsloth