qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)vsTwenty
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | Twenty | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Torrent | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 1 758 | 60 037 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +2 579 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 52 | 10 |
| Latest release | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Twenty scores 84/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Twenty.
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; Twenty needs more configuration.
Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 579 stars in 30 days).
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) details →Twenty details →