# qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Torrent | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 1 759 | 8 552 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +83 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 52 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.

qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qbittorrent-linuxserverio-vs-tube-archivist