qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)vsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Torrent | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 1 759 | 4 115 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 52 | 0 |
| Latest release | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; Apache Tika needs more configuration.
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) details →Apache Tika details →