# qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Torrent | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 1 758 | 47 724 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 ✓ | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 52 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.

qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.

## Details

- [qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qbittorrent-linuxserverio-vs-text-generation-webui