# qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) vs Sonarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | Sonarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Torrent | #1 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 758 | 17 477 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +980 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 52 ✓ | 34 |
| Latest release | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 | v5.0.0.2838 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Sonarr scores 81/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.

qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 34 for Sonarr.

If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; Sonarr needs more configuration.

Sonarr is growing faster right now (+980 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio.md)
- [Sonarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qbittorrent-linuxserverio-vs-sonarr