# qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) vs sglang

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | sglang |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Torrent | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 1 758 | 38 325 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +1 943 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 52 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sglang scores 86/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.

qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for sglang.

If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.

sglang is growing faster right now (+1 943 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio.md)
- [sglang](https://selfhost.directory/project/sglang) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sglang.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qbittorrent-linuxserverio-vs-sglang