# qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) vs Radarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | Radarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Torrent | #3 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 758 | 14 670 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +246 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 52 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Radarr scores 78/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.

qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for Radarr.

Radarr is growing faster right now (+246 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio.md)
- [Radarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qbittorrent-linuxserverio-vs-radarr