# pyroscope vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | pyroscope | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 11 711 | 93 035 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +1 288 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | v2.4.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 73/100 for pyroscope, so it is the safer default.

pyroscope ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [pyroscope](https://selfhost.directory/project/pyroscope) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pyroscope.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pyroscope-vs-uptime-kuma