# pyroscope vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | pyroscope | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 11 711 | 17 183 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.4.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

pyroscope scores 73/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.

pyroscope ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

pyroscope is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [pyroscope](https://selfhost.directory/project/pyroscope) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pyroscope.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pyroscope-vs-upptime