# pyroscope vs ReadMeABook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | pyroscope | ReadMeABook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 711 ✓ | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +65 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.4.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

pyroscope scores 73/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.

ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for pyroscope.

If you want the quickest setup, pyroscope is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.

## Details

- [pyroscope](https://selfhost.directory/project/pyroscope) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pyroscope.md)
- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pyroscope-vs-readmeabook