# pwnflow vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | pwnflow | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #56 of 78 in Security | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 281 | 118 043 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +5 684 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 44/100 for pwnflow, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for pwnflow.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 684 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [pwnflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/pwnflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pwnflow.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pwnflow-vs-tradingagents