PVE-UPSvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PVE-UPS | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 356 | 114 252 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 543 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 8 |
| Latest release | v4.3.0 · 10 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 51/100 for PVE-UPS, so it is the safer default.
PVE-UPS ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, PVE-UPS is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 543 stars in 30 days).
PVE-UPS details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep PVE-UPS, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with