PVE-UPSvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PVE-UPS | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 362 | 45 072 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +1 671 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 35 |
| Latest release | v4.3.0 · 10 Oct 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 51/100 for PVE-UPS, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for PVE-UPS.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 671 stars in 30 days).
PVE-UPS details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep PVE-UPS, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with