# Pulse vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pulse | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 6 970 | 93 035 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +229 | +1 288 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pulse-vs-uptime-kuma