# Pulse vs Stalwart Mail Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pulse | Stalwart Mail Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #2 of 16 in Mail Server |
| GitHub stars | 6 970 | 15 462 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +229 | +678 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 ✓ | 31 |
| Latest release | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0-only AND LicenseRef-SEL |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Stalwart Mail Server scores 78/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 31 for Stalwart Mail Server.

If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; Stalwart Mail Server needs more configuration.

Stalwart Mail Server is growing faster right now (+678 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)
- [Stalwart Mail Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/stalwart-mail-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stalwart-mail-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pulse-vs-stalwart-mail-server