# Pulse vs SearXNG

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pulse | SearXNG |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 6 973 | 38 962 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +232 | +1 396 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.

If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; SearXNG needs more configuration.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 396 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)
- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pulse-vs-searxng