# Pulse vs RomM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pulse | RomM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 6 970 | 14 119 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +229 | +963 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 5.4.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

RomM scores 81/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for RomM.

If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; RomM needs more configuration.

RomM is growing faster right now (+963 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)
- [RomM](https://selfhost.directory/project/romm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/romm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pulse-vs-romm