# Pulse vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pulse | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 973 | 45 007 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +232 | +1 634 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 ✓ | 34 |
| Latest release | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 34 for Reactive Resume.

If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 634 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pulse-vs-reactive-resume