# Pterodactyl vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pterodactyl | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 62 in Game Servers | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 9 438 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +184 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Pterodactyl scores 75/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.

Pterodactyl ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.

Pterodactyl is growing faster right now (+184 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pterodactyl](https://selfhost.directory/project/pterodactyl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pterodactyl.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pterodactyl-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s