Pterodactylvswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pterodactyl | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 62 in Game Servers | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 9 439 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +184 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Pterodactyl scores 75/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Pterodactyl.
If you want the quickest setup, wyoming-piper is easier to run; Pterodactyl needs more configuration.
Pterodactyl is growing faster right now (+184 stars in 30 days).
Pterodactyl details →wyoming-piper details →