# Pterodactyl vs Toolbarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pterodactyl | Toolbarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 62 in Game Servers | #5 of 6 in Administration |
| GitHub stars | 9 437 ✓ | 188 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +183 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Pterodactyl scores 75/100 against 39/100 for Toolbarr, so it is the safer default.

Pterodactyl ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Toolbarr.

If you want the quickest setup, Toolbarr is easier to run; Pterodactyl needs more configuration.

Pterodactyl is growing faster right now (+183 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pterodactyl](https://selfhost.directory/project/pterodactyl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pterodactyl.md)
- [Toolbarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/toolbarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/toolbarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pterodactyl-vs-toolbarr