# Prysm vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Prysm | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 18 in Blockchain | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 3 790 | 8 552 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +83 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 65/100 for Prysm, so it is the safer default.

Prysm ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Prysm](https://selfhost.directory/project/prysm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/prysm.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/prysm-vs-tube-archivist