# Prysm vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Prysm | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 18 in Blockchain | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 3 790 | 24 052 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +774 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 65/100 for Prysm, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Prysm.

temporal is growing faster right now (+774 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Prysm](https://selfhost.directory/project/prysm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/prysm.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/prysm-vs-temporal