PrysmvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Prysm | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 18 in Blockchain | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 790 | 45 021 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +1 620 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 34 |
| Latest release | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 65/100 for Prysm, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Prysm.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Prysm needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 620 stars in 30 days).
Prysm details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep Prysm, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with