# Prysm vs RabbitMQ

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Prysm | RabbitMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 18 in Blockchain | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 3 790 | 13 949 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +74 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 65/100 for Prysm, so it is the safer default.

RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Prysm.

If you want the quickest setup, RabbitMQ is easier to run; Prysm needs more configuration.

RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+74 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Prysm](https://selfhost.directory/project/prysm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/prysm.md)
- [RabbitMQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/prysm-vs-rabbitmq