PrysmvsRabbitMQ
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Prysm | RabbitMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 18 in Blockchain | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 3 790 | 13 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 14 |
| Latest release | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 65/100 for Prysm, so it is the safer default.
RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Prysm.
If you want the quickest setup, RabbitMQ is easier to run; Prysm needs more configuration.
RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).
Prysm details →RabbitMQ details →
Swap a project
Keep Prysm, compare it with
Keep RabbitMQ, compare it with