# PruneMate vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PruneMate | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Docker Management | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 468 | 93 041 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 294 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | V1.3.3 · 15 Feb 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | HTML | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 46/100 for PruneMate, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for PruneMate.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 294 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PruneMate](https://selfhost.directory/project/prunemate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/prunemate.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/prunemate-vs-uptime-kuma