# PruneMate vs qdrant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PruneMate | qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Docker Management | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 468 | 35 301 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +530 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | V1.3.3 · 15 Feb 2026 | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | HTML | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 46/100 for PruneMate, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for PruneMate.

If you want the quickest setup, PruneMate is easier to run; qdrant needs more configuration.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+530 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PruneMate](https://selfhost.directory/project/prunemate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/prunemate.md)
- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/prunemate-vs-qdrant