proxyscotchvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| proxyscotch | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 13 in API | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 428 | 117 848 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +5 489 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 44/100 for proxyscotch, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for proxyscotch.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 489 stars in 30 days).
proxyscotch details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep proxyscotch, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with