# proxyscotch vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | proxyscotch | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 13 in API | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 428 | 45 007 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 634 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 44/100 for proxyscotch, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for proxyscotch.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 634 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [proxyscotch](https://selfhost.directory/project/proxyscotch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proxyscotch.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/proxyscotch-vs-reactive-resume