# ProxmoxMCP-Plus vs Shinobi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ProxmoxMCP-Plus | Shinobi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 15 in Virtualization | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 624 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.6.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | — |

## Which one should you pick?

Shinobi scores 66/100 against 54/100 for ProxmoxMCP-Plus, so it is the safer default.

ProxmoxMCP-Plus ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shinobi.

If you want the quickest setup, ProxmoxMCP-Plus is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.

## Details

- [ProxmoxMCP-Plus](https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmoxmcp-plus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmoxmcp-plus.md)
- [Shinobi](https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/proxmoxmcp-plus-vs-shinobi