# Proxmox Kubernetes Engine vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Proxmox Kubernetes Engine | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 244 | 8 553 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +84 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.0.7 · 13 Sept 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | — | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 41/100 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine, so it is the safer default.

Proxmox Kubernetes Engine ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Proxmox Kubernetes Engine](https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmox-kubernetes-engine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmox-kubernetes-engine.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/proxmox-kubernetes-engine-vs-tube-archivist