Proxmox Kubernetes EnginevsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Proxmox Kubernetes Engine | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 244 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.0.7 · 13 Sept 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | — | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 41/100 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine, so it is the safer default.
Proxmox Kubernetes Engine ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).
Proxmox Kubernetes Engine details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep Proxmox Kubernetes Engine, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with