# Proxmox Kubernetes Engine vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Proxmox Kubernetes Engine | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 244 | 95 299 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 337 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.0.7 · 13 Sept 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | — | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 41/100 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine.

If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; Proxmox Kubernetes Engine needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 337 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Proxmox Kubernetes Engine](https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmox-kubernetes-engine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmox-kubernetes-engine.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/proxmox-kubernetes-engine-vs-stirling-pdf