# Proxmox Kubernetes Engine vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Proxmox Kubernetes Engine | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 244 | 29 391 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +112 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.0.7 · 13 Sept 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | — | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 41/100 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine.

If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; Proxmox Kubernetes Engine needs more configuration.

SRS is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Proxmox Kubernetes Engine](https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmox-kubernetes-engine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmox-kubernetes-engine.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/proxmox-kubernetes-engine-vs-srs