Proxmox Kubernetes EnginevsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Proxmox Kubernetes Engine | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 244 | 35 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +868 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 28 |
| Latest release | v0.0.7 · 13 Sept 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | — | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 41/100 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; Proxmox Kubernetes Engine needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+868 stars in 30 days).
Proxmox Kubernetes Engine details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Proxmox Kubernetes Engine, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with