# ProxMenux vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ProxMenux | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Backup Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 3 241 | 24 037 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +777 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.2.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 83/100 against 62/100 for ProxMenux, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ProxMenux.

If you want the quickest setup, ProxMenux is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+777 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ProxMenux](https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmenux) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmenux.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/proxmenux-vs-temporal