# Proliferate vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Proliferate | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #52 of 124 in AI | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 519 | 45 067 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 666 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | proliferate-v0.4.29 · 27 Aug 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 49/100 for Proliferate, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Proliferate.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Proliferate needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 666 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Proliferate](https://selfhost.directory/project/proliferate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proliferate.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/proliferate-vs-reactive-resume