# Project OSRM vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Project OSRM | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 181 | 12 825 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 ✓ | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

zookeeper scores 73/100 against 69/100 for Project OSRM, so it is the safer default.

Project OSRM ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

If you want the quickest setup, zookeeper is easier to run; Project OSRM needs more configuration.

Project OSRM is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Project OSRM](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/project-osrm-vs-zookeeper