# Project OSRM vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Project OSRM | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 8 178 | 16 059 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | +244 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 69/100 for Project OSRM, so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Project OSRM.

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; Project OSRM needs more configuration.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is growing faster right now (+244 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Project OSRM](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/project-osrm-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap