# Project OSRM vs UrBackup

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Project OSRM | UrBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #18 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 8 178 ✓ | 943 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 ✓ | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.5.38 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Project OSRM scores 69/100 against 60/100 for UrBackup, so it is the safer default.

Project OSRM ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UrBackup.

If you want the quickest setup, UrBackup is easier to run; Project OSRM needs more configuration.

Project OSRM is growing faster right now (+75 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Project OSRM](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm.md)
- [UrBackup](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/project-osrm-vs-urbackup