# Project OSRM vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Project OSRM | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 8 179 | 93 036 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 | +1 289 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 69/100 for Project OSRM, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Project OSRM.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Project OSRM needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Project OSRM](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/project-osrm-vs-uptime-kuma