# Project OSRM vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Project OSRM | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 178 | 95 252 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | +2 339 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Other |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 69/100 for Project OSRM, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Project OSRM.

If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; Project OSRM needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 339 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Project OSRM](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/project-osrm-vs-stirling-pdf