# Project OSRM vs QFieldCloud

> Two self-hosted [Mapping & GPS projects](https://selfhost.directory/mapping-gps), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Project OSRM | QFieldCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 8 179 ✓ | 246 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Project OSRM scores 69/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.

Project OSRM ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QFieldCloud.

Project OSRM is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Project OSRM](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm.md)
- [QFieldCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/project-osrm-vs-qfieldcloud