# Project N.O.M.A.D. vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Project N.O.M.A.D. | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 41 160 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 946 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.

Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Project N.O.M.A.D..

If you want the quickest setup, Project N.O.M.A.D. is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 946 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Project N.O.M.A.D.](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-n-o-m-a-d) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-n-o-m-a-d.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/project-n-o-m-a-d-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s