# private-gpt vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | private-gpt | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in LLM Integration | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 57 613 ✓ | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.1 · 18 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

private-gpt scores 81/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

private-gpt ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

If you want the quickest setup, private-gpt is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.

private-gpt is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [private-gpt](https://selfhost.directory/project/private-gpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/private-gpt.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/private-gpt-vs-zookeeper