# private-gpt vs wyoming-piper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | private-gpt | wyoming-piper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in LLM Integration | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 57 617 ✓ | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +88 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.1 · 18 Jun 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

private-gpt scores 81/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.

wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for private-gpt.

If you want the quickest setup, private-gpt is easier to run; wyoming-piper needs more configuration.

private-gpt is growing faster right now (+88 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [private-gpt](https://selfhost.directory/project/private-gpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/private-gpt.md)
- [wyoming-piper](https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/private-gpt-vs-wyoming-piper