# private-gpt vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | private-gpt | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in LLM Integration | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 57 613 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +87 | +157 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.1 · 18 Jun 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

private-gpt scores 81/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for private-gpt.

If you want the quickest setup, private-gpt is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

## Details

- [private-gpt](https://selfhost.directory/project/private-gpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/private-gpt.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/private-gpt-vs-woodpecker-ci